Chapter 6—Resource Planning Systems
TRUE/FALSE
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: F PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
ANS: T PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
MULTIPLE CHOICE
a. |
Capacity Production Strategy |
b. |
Mixed production Strategy |
c. |
Level Production Strategy |
d. |
Chase Production Strategy |
ANS: D PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
a. |
The workforce fluctuates in response to the demand pattern |
b. |
Finished goods inventories remain constant |
c. |
Both A & B |
d. |
None of these |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
a. |
The Level Production Strategy |
b. |
Mixed Production Strategy |
c. |
The Chase Production Strategy |
d. |
The Aggregate Production Strategy |
ANS: A PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
The Level Production Strategy |
b. |
Mixed Production Strategy |
c. |
The Chase Production Strategy |
d. |
The Aggregate Production Strategy |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Aggregate production plan |
b. |
Master production schedule |
c. |
Bill of material |
d. |
Super bill of materials |
ANS: A PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Resource requirements plan |
b. |
Material requirements plan |
c. |
Rough-cut capacity plan |
d. |
Master production schedule |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Distribution Requirement Plan |
b. |
Material Requirement Plan |
c. |
Capacity Requirement Plan |
d. |
Rough-Cut Capacity Plan |
ANS: D PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Materials Requirements Plan |
b. |
Master Capacity Plan |
c. |
Aggregate Production Plan |
d. |
Capacity Requirements Plan |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Material requirements plan |
b. |
Master production schedule |
c. |
Demand time fence |
d. |
Capacity Requirements Plan |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Master Production Schedule |
b. |
Most recent positive ATP |
c. |
Beginning inventory |
d. |
Bill of materials |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
Weeks |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
MPS |
BI = 30 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
Committed Customer Orders |
20 |
5 |
25 |
15 |
|
ATP:D |
|||||
a. |
ATP1 = 0 |
b. |
ATP1 = 10 |
c. |
ATP1 = 15 |
d. |
ATP1 = 20 |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Application Difficulty: Easy
Part X |
Week |
||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
Gross Requirements |
32 |
16 |
34 |
40 |
|
Scheduled Receipts |
10 |
||||
Projected On-Hand inventory |
46 |
||||
Planned Order Releases |
|||||
a. |
34 |
b. |
26 |
c. |
29 |
d. |
14 |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Bill of materials |
b. |
Distribution requirements plan |
c. |
Planned order releases |
d. |
Aggregate production plan |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Level 0 |
b. |
Level 1 |
c. |
Level 2 |
d. |
Level 3 |
ANS: A PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Discrete available-to-promise |
b. |
Cumulative available-to-promise without looking ahead |
c. |
Indiscrete available-to-promise |
d. |
Cumulative available-to-promise with looking ahead |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Projected on-hand inventory |
b. |
Time bucket |
c. |
Net requirement |
d. |
Scheduled receipt |
ANS: D PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Gross requirement |
b. |
Component |
c. |
Net requirement |
d. |
Scheduled receipt |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
The systems needed continuous modifications |
b. |
The systems were not user-friendly |
c. |
The systems were designed to perform a very specific operational function |
d. |
All of these |
ANS: D PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
ERP systems are easy to implement, particularly in large organizations |
b. |
ERP systems tie together a variety of specialized systems |
c. |
ERP systems are successful with two-dimensional processes |
d. |
ERP systems are inexpensive to implement |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
a. |
The increased use of email during the 1990's |
b. |
The trend for companies to eliminate their supply chain partners |
c. |
The year 2000 millennium bug |
d. |
All of the above |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
The system to crash often |
b. |
The same information to be stored in multiple locations |
c. |
Data integrity |
d. |
Planned order releases |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Enterprise Resource Planning |
b. |
Electronic Resource Provider |
c. |
Executive Resource Plan |
d. |
Electronic Requirements Provider |
ANS: A PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
ERP systems are designed to take advantage of Internet technology |
b. |
ERP systems enable the firm to automate some of the steps of a manufacturing process |
c. |
Both A & B |
d. |
None of the above |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Fairly inexpensive to purchase and implement |
b. |
Enables the company to utilize a single centralized database system, thus eliminating duplicate data entries |
c. |
Flexible enough that it allows different companies with different business models to mold the new ERP system to fit the company's business model |
d. |
All of the above |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Customer relationship management and Human resource management |
b. |
Computer assisted drawing and Photo enhancing |
c. |
Operating systems and Internet browsing |
d. |
All of the above |
ANS: A PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Human Resources Management |
b. |
Customer Relationship Management |
c. |
Marketing Resources Management |
d. |
Supply Chain Management |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
ERP systems reduce the bullwhip effect |
b. |
ERP systems are very complex and have proven difficult to implement |
c. |
ERP systems use a single database and common infrastructure |
d. |
Once ERP information is entered it is made available to all users |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Best-of-breed |
b. |
Elite integrator |
c. |
Single integrator |
d. |
Premier application |
ANS: C PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Best-of-breed solution |
b. |
Elite integrator solution |
c. |
Multi-modular solution |
d. |
Premier application solution |
ANS: A PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
a. |
Top management becomes overcommitted to the point where they constantly encourage the employees during implementation |
b. |
Lack of communication within an organization |
c. |
Organizations tend to spend too much time and money training their employees on the new system |
d. |
All of the above |
ANS: B PTS: 1
BUSPROG: Technology LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Easy
SHORT ANSWER
ANS:
Chase strategy - Adjusts capacity to match demand patterns. Firms must hire and lay off workers to match its production rate to demand. Hiring, training, and termination costs are significant cost components in the chase production strategy.
Level strategy - Relies on a constant output rate and capacity while varying inventory and backlog levels to handle the fluctuating demand patterns. Firms keep their workforce levels constant and rely on fluctuating finished goods inventories and backlogs to meet demand. This strategy it is more suited for firms that require highly skilled labor.
Mixed strategy - Strives to maintain a stable workforce while using short-term means to manage short-term high demand. This strategy uses overtime and subcontracting to cope with the high demand periods. Some firms will schedule preventive maintenance or produce complementary products that require similar resources but different demand cycles during the off-peak demand periods.
PTS: 5
BUSPROG: Communication LO: 6-1 Bloom’s: Knowledge Difficulty: Moderate
Item – Speed Boat A |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Gross Requirements |
25 |
35 |
40 |
35 |
|
Schedule Receipts |
10 |
40 |
|||
Projected on Hand Inventory |
30 |
||||
Planned Order Releases |
|||||
Q = LFL; LT = 2; SS = 10 |
|||||
ANS:
Item – Speed Boat A |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Gross Requirements |
25 |
35 |
40 |
35 |
|
Schedule Receipts |
10 |
40 |
|||
Projected on Hand Inventory |
30 |
15 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
Planned Order Releases |
30 |
35 |
|||
Q = LFL; LT = 2; SS = 10 |
|||||
PTS: 5
BUSPROG: Analytic LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Application Difficulty: Moderate
ANS:
Legacy MRP systems were designed to perform a very specific operational function, and were programmed as independent entities with little regard for meeting requirements or coordinating with other functional areas. Communication between systems is often limited and visibility across functional areas is severely restricted. Legacy systems were implemented to gather data for transactional purposes, and thus lacked analytical capabilities.
PTS: 5
BUSPROG: Communication LO: 6-4 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Moderate
ANS:
ERP stands for Enterprise Resource Planning systems. ERP systems are manufacturing information systems that are intended to connect all functional areas and operations of an organization, as well as its suppliers and customers, in some cases, via a common software infrastructure and database. The systems utilize a centralized and shared database that allows the organization to easily share information and communicate quickly with all of its internal functional members as well as any participating supply-chain partners.
PTS: 5
BUSPROG: Communication LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Moderate
ANS:
ERP systems utilize numerous applications or modules that are integrated during implementation in hopes of creating a single coordinated system. These applications or modules are developed, sold, and integrated by a number of different providers. Some modules or applications are considered to be better than others. The textbook outlines two solutions in developing a coordinate ERP system. One is a best-of-breed solution and the other is the single integrator solution.
The best-of-breed solution takes the best application or module for each individual function and supply chain.
The single integrator approach, on the other hand, would utilize all the desired applications from a single vendor.
PTS: 5
BUSPROG: Communication LO: 6-6 Bloom’s: Application Difficulty: Moderate
ESSAY
a. |
Which is more appropriate for a conventional service organization? Why? |
b. |
Which is more appropriate for a conventional manufacturing organization? Why? |
c. |
What are the three hierarchical components of materials planning? Provide a brief description of each. |
d. |
What are the three hierarchical components of capacity planning? Provide a brief description of each. |
ANS:
a. |
Which is more appropriate for a conventional service organization? Why? |
Because services are unable to inventory their services, capacity planning is considered more important to service industries than materials planning. |
|
b. |
Which is more appropriate for a conventional manufacturing organization? Why? |
Because manufacturers are typically able to build inventories of their products, materials planning is considered more important to manufacturing industries than capacity planning. |
The answers to the first two questions should not imply that both capacity planning and materials planning cannot be important in both service and manufacturing industries, but due to nature of what each provides for their customer, services are more often concerned with meeting demand with available capacity while many manufacturers can meet demand with built up inventories. Nonetheless, many modern manufacturers are moving to pull type systems so they too will be concerned with capacity.
c. |
What are the three hierarchical components of materials planning? Provide a brief description of each. |
|
1. |
Aggregate Production Plan - APP - long-range materials plan/more than 1 year. This plan is likely to deal with product groups/families. This plan sets the aggregate output rate, workforce size, utilization and inventory, and/or backlog levels for an entire facility. |
|
2. |
Master Production Schedule - MPS - a medium range materials plan/6 to 18 months. The master production schedule deals with end items. It shows the quantity and timing of the end items or services that will be produced. |
|
3. |
Materials Requirement Planning - MRP - a short-range materials plan/days or weeks. MRP deals with components/subassemblies. A detailed planning process for components in parts that supports the Master production schedule. The end item requirements from the Master production schedule are converted into a set of time phased components in part requirements |
d. |
What are the three hierarchical components of capacity planning? Provide a brief description of each. |
|
1. |
Resource Requirement Planning - RRP - This is a long-range capacity planning module. The RRP is used to check whether aggregate resources are capable of satisfying the aggregate production plan. The RRP typically considers labor hours and machine offers. Additional considerations include new facilities and/or additional capital equipment. |
|
2. |
Rough Cut Capacity Planning - RCCP - the medium-range capacity planning. This plan checks the feasibility of the Master production schedule. The RCCP takes a master production schedule and converts it for production to capacity require. Then it compares the capacity available during each production period. |
|
3. |
Capacity Requirement Planning - CRP - this is short-range capacity planning. This plan is used to check the feasibility of the MRP. This plan computes the capacity requirements at each workstation during specific periods to see whether or not they will be capable of manufacturing the items specified by the MRP. |
PTS: 10
BUSPROG: Communication LO: 6-2 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Difficult
Weeks |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
MPS |
BI = 20 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
20 |
Committed Customer Orders |
20 |
5 |
20 |
15 |
|
ATP:D |
|||||
ANS:
Weeks |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
MPS |
BI = 20 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
20 |
Committed Customer Orders |
20 |
5 |
20 |
15 |
|
ATP:D |
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
ATP1 = 20 +10 – 20 = 10 Then ATP2 = 15 - 5 = 10. Next ATP3 = 10 - 20 = -10. Negative not allowed, so use uncommitted inventory from week 2. Revised ATP2 = 10 - 10 = 0. Revised ATP3 = 0. ATP4 = 20 - 15 = 5.
PTS: 10
BUSPROG: Analysis LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Application Difficulty: Difficult
PART 1
(Lot size=lot-for-lot) WEEK
(Lead time=2 weeks) 1 2 3 4_
Gross Requirements 75 120
Sched. Receipts ________________________
On-Hand Inventory 65 ________________________ Bill of Materials
Pl. Order Releases ________________________
PART 2
(Lot size=lot-for-lot) WEEK
(Lead time=1 week) 1 2 3 4_
Gross Requirements
Sched. Receipts ________________________
On-Hand Inventory 20 ________________________
Pl. Order Releases ________________________
ANS:
PART 1
(Lot size=lot-for-lot) WEEK
(Lead time=2 weeks) 1 2 3 4_
Gross Requirements 75 120
Sched. Receipts ________________________
On-Hand Inventory 65 ______________0______0__
Pl. Order Releases 10____120_______________
PART 2
(Lot size=lot-for-lot) WEEK
(Lead time=1 week) 1 2 3 4_
Gross Requirements 20 240
Sched. Receipts ________________________
On-Hand Inventory 20 _0______0_______________
Pl. Order Releases 240_____________________
Part 1: Since on-hand inventory is not enough to satisfy the gross requirements in week 3, we must add 10 planned order releases in week 1. To satisfy the gross requirements in week 4 of 120, we must add 120 planned order releases in week 2 (since there is a 2 week lead time for the part).
Part 2: To generate the gross requirements for part 2, we must multiply the planned order releases of part 1 by 2 since the bill-of-materials states that 2 of part 2 are required for each part 1. The on-hand inventory of 20 satisfies the gross requirements for week 1. In order to satisfy the gross requirements of 240 in week 2, we must have planned order releases of 240 in week 1 (since there is a 1 week lead time for the part).
PTS: 10
BUSPROG: Communication LO: 6-3 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Difficult
Your boss asks you, "Do you think our company needs an ERP system?" Obviously, without knowing the details of this company or the industry in which it operates, it would be difficult to provide a detailed answer to this question.
Your new project may take days, weeks, or even months to answer accurately, but before you begin your research you should develop a short but detailed outline for a paper that will inform the boss about the basics of ERP, the advantages of ERP, as well as the disadvantages of ERP.
Answer some of these questions within your outline/answer:
· |
What is ERP? |
· |
Why should the organization get an ERP system? |
· |
Why might the organization not want to get ERP? |
· |
If we did get an ERP system what would be required for successful implementation? |
ANS:
· |
What is ERP? |
An ERP System is an organizational information system that runs on a single database. Some of the key objectives of an ERP system include coordinating the information requirements for many or all of the functional departments of an organization and making data readily available to everyone associated with the supply chain and via a user-friendly system. |
|
· |
Why should the organization get an ERP system? |
Some of the benefits to getting in ERP system include utilization of a single database, which requires a fairly simple computer infrastructure, easy access to data and information for all employees of the organization, the potential for improved data analysis because of the easy access to data, greater coordination with supply-chain partners, the potential to hand off important decisions to supply-chain partners who may be more qualified to respond to market changes. |
|
· |
Why might we not want to get ERP? |
Investing in an ERP system can be extremely costly. An organization, in addition to paying for the ERP system, will incur high costs to implement the system, train its employees, alter its processes, and convert data from Legacy systems for use on the new ERP system. Also, organizations need to prepare for a drop in productivity due to the learning curve associated with the implementation of the ERP system. |
|
· |
If we did get an ERP system what would be required for successful implementation? |
Successful implementation of an ERP system requires the commitment and backing of top management, adequate investment resources, appropriate system training, excellent organizational communication, and an ERP system that's capabilities match the requirements of the organization/processes it will be serving. |
PTS: 10
BUSPROG: Communication LO: 6-5 Bloom’s: Comprehension Difficulty: Difficult
hihi
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below.
Assignment Hippo (2021) . Retrive from http://www.assignmenthippo.com/sample-assignment/resource-planning-systems-mcqs
"." Assignment Hippo ,2021, http://www.assignmenthippo.com/sample-assignment/resource-planning-systems-mcqs
Assignment Hippo (2021) . Available from: http://www.assignmenthippo.com/sample-assignment/resource-planning-systems-mcqs
[Accessed 02/03/2021].
Assignment Hippo . ''(Assignment Hippo,2021) http://www.assignmenthippo.com/sample-assignment/resource-planning-systems-mcqs accessed 02/03/2021.
Want to order fresh copy of the Sample Template Answers? online or do you need the old solutions for Sample Template, contact our customer support or talk to us to get the answers of it.
Our motto is deliver assignment on Time. Our Expert writers deliver quality assignments to the students.
Get reliable and unique assignments by using our 100% plagiarism-free.
Get connected 24*7 with our Live Chat support executives to receive instant solutions for your assignment.
Get Help with all the subjects like: Programming, Accounting, Finance, Engineering, Law and Marketing.
Get premium service at a pocket-friendly rate at AssignmentHippo
I was struggling so hard to complete my marketing assignment on brand development when I decided to finally reach to the experts of this portal. They certainly deliver perfect consistency and the desired format. The content prepared by the experts of this platform was simply amazing. I definitely owe my grades to them.
Get instant assignment help