Essay on Guns in America

In America, today the gun control is considered to be a very serious issue. There are many different opinions on this problem and the national rifle association eventually feels that the guns are considered to be safe when they are usually used for the protection by the responsible citizens and others eventually feel that the guns are basically too dangerous to be kept in homes. So, it all depends upon perceptions some thinks keeping guns is good while others think it is dangerous. There are people think that their opinions are right all according to the second amendment basically bearing of arms by the citizens of America but then there have been different interpretations of it at the same time. The reasons that people eventually feel that gun ownership is considered to be a problem at the same time. Guns usually lead to increase in crime, household and murder in order to reduce the availability of the guns and offers education on the gun safety and all of these things that usually assist in order to make America safer. In order to make up the mind on what one is felt about the issue and also make sure in order to consider the opinions of others in order to collect statistics. Usually, people from the NRA are all against the gun control and also feel that the people are mainly responsible for the negative effects guns have on America. Usually, guns right in America have eventually the centre of the debate for quite a long time now and this is because of the discussion that usually closes hits and so many United States Residents at the same time. According to the latest research at the University of Chicago around 200-250 million firearms were in private circulation in the entire country. Therefore the same research eventually indicated that only one in each 4 Americans usually owned a gun in the year 2009. However, guns are considered to be an important part of society in America but the major risk usually outweighs the basic benefits at the same time. There are some of the people who eventually benefits in order to own a gun and also many different innocent people also killed by the other registered firearms. The basic argument that the guns eventually protect people in order to deter the criminals out from breaking the entire laws and it usually didn’t outweigh the negative consequences at the same time in order to own a gun. The American constitution has not yet amended in order to reflect the new laws that further didn’t allow the firearms to all the public.

So, according to the centre of the Urban and also metropolitan policy there are around 20,000 gun control laws in the United States of America and the scholars out there have cited this number with the regularity and also is accepted as a fact majorly. So, the fact is that there are basically so many gun control laws that already exist and have been used for a reason in order to not increase the number of the gun control laws in the US. There around the 20,000f figure, there are other gun control laws that as used by the ex-president about 11 weeks after someone eventually attempted in order assassinate him. The gun control laws were basically in place and don’t necessarily deal in order to keep the weapons out of the hands of the wrong people. The laws are eventually governed how the guns are basically manufactured, sold and designed. The possession is basically not compulsory because of the reason these laws are basically in the place. There is basically an excess of the gun laws in order to decide what one should include in the laws. This initially involves the estimate about the number of the gun control laws and also with the aforementioned conclusions at the same time that is basically related to the manufacturing or sale and design. There were about 20,000 gun control laws that were likely to deterred politicians in order to create more specified laws because they were usually under the assumption that the guns that eventually is regulated. But apart from investigating the numbers of laws that are basically in existence and hence it would be considered to be a better idea in order to look at the impact of the laws that are basically in place. People who eventually support the laws banning guns as it often says this will lead to unnecessary violence. Also, a campaign came up in order to pass the federal guns laws and public policies and different rules and regulations at the same time in the grassroots activism effort. The campaign majorly affects in order to elect the politicians that usually support these guns laws in order to increase the awareness about the violence that is related to the use of a gun. There are some of the people who eventually argue and that are basically not practical in order to allow people to use their own guns and there is also the basic consideration that the American constitution says that United States residents in order to have the right to further bear arms. It is basically contained in the Second Amendment. The basic Amendment eventually states that the people who eventually allow in order to have their gun right to further protect all against the even the threat of the government in order to take the control over their arms. However, due to the second amendment, the federal government basically has no authority in order to take away the right to bear the arms and also the person with the guns has not eventually been restricted because of their past at the same time. Therefore, the constitution further places the same amount of the protection on the guns as it usually does allow the person’s right in order to speak up. There are some of the people who might eventually say that the Second Amendment is considered to be the remnant of the time when the American culture is basically considered to be different and there eventually be any kind of weight that is further given to the right person. But then the change is quite compulsory and this is because if the rights duly exist then there hasn’t been the concentrated effort from the current politicians in order to get rid of the right. This eventually means that the Second Amendment is considered to be quite relevant today. There are most of the courts that have been continued in order to interpret the second amendment as one of the collective rights or the academic scholarship is basically divided. Though, the courts usually say that it is quite right in order to mean that it will eventually take the lot of effort in order to create the gun control laws in America. It generally tells me that there are very intelligent people that are basically involved and also consider the second amendment relevant in today’s United States culture. This further complicates the debate and hence provide with the solid argument on which one is opposed.

Generally, the United nation is basically looking in order to restrict the basic rights with the Arms trade treaty and this eventually cause major anxiety and the UN secretary have already claimed that the treaty is basically robust and is also binding and at the same time it will have a major impact on the millions of the people who are majorly involved in not only the normal armed conflict or repression but also on other different transfer of arms at the same time. this is considered to be a major attempt in order to prevent all of these arms from actually becoming owned by different terrorists and it should eventually be noted with the UN in order to play a major role in this decision and apart from this the fact that they have recently been found quite guilty in order to offer the bombs and also guns to the Bashar Assad regime and basically a terrorist group that is majorly slaughtering thousands of Syrians. It eventually makes the absolutely no sense in order to further allow Iran also the member of the UN and let alone in order to further make different decisions on the gun rules. It is further tempting to further dismiss the treaty and also the outrageous involvement of Iran because it is considered to be just another UN absurdity at the same time. One of the big reasons is that it is considered to be such a big deal for America to further involve the civilian arms and also ammunition that is basically involved in the major definition of what the UN usually seeks in order to get rid of. Though, the US and Russia caused the treaty to further defeat and also allowed different human rights that advocated and said that the US was majorly responsible for the defeat.

According to the economists, the gun control is considered to be too late and then there are too many guns present and an individual have enough right in order to bear the arms and are now entrenched in this constitutional law. Gun eventually supports the argument that whether or not the economist duly agrees that the guns should be considered to be right in America because it doesn’t matter as it is too late in order to take out the American culture and what it usually defines. People duly get this freedom for a reason and they have the right in order to defend. If you don’t have the gun rights then people are at major risk of being taken advantage by those who eventually find different firearms through the illicit means and taking away the guns right is basically like equipping the army with the better knives and this is because the enemy could eventually be coming into your doorstep and the enemy is basically equipped with the firearms gun supporters to argue. Everyone out there eventually says that Colorado slaughter and other similar crimes have really nothing to do with the gun laws and this is because the guns are basically used in the act that isn’t legal anyway. There are main standards that eventually have to be met in order to regulate the type of firearms that are permissible but in order to further discredit each and every firearm usually based on the cases that usually involve the guns that aren’t legal and is basically comparing the apples and also oranges that might go on.

Although, it is considered to be quite important now than ever in order to define whether the 2^nd amendment is relevant today because it was when the constitution has eventually written and without denouncing the major commitments in order to protect the right to bear the arms the United States is further making clear to all the United States Nations and also every other person about the US stance is on the gun ownership. Other anti-terrorism laws are basically very much important and they are further broadening and also becoming more modified each and every year. They also need to be carried out in order to change what many of us usually believe in and also considered to be the most significant right in the United States today. Gun control laws have already brought up the hot topic after the group of people were shot at and of course there are major different concerns when an individual usually shot to death and then there are events such as the Colorado shooting in the year 2012 the topic usually comes up with often in the media and it eventually seems like there is a mass shooting each and every year in the United States. In 2011, Arizona usually started to kill around 6 people and also total 13 people were injured at that point of time. Then the Arizona legislature further introduced the two new bills in order ease the gun laws and are no longer before the shoots eventually take place.  The community guide is considered to be the major resource of the US centres for the diseases control that further investigates and is majorly based on the proofs in order to further improve the public health and this investigation eventually looked at over 40 studies about the gun control laws that usually varies from ban of the firearms to the restricting of the waiting people in order to obtain a firearm. All of these studies proved to be insufficient in order to see whether there is any kind of effect of the laws all against the firearms. The research then concluded that there aren’t enough credible studies in order to indicate the gun control laws as they are considered to be more effective. One of the major issue that was faced that the details that were attained were limited in order to further respect the equal privacy of the individual who usually owns the gun.

The Gun control act of 1968 is considered to be the basic restriction of the people who are basically prohibited in for buying different firearms. This involves people who are basically committed to the living inside the mental institutions and who are majorly addicted in order to control a particular substance and those who are examined to be dangerous or incompetent. People who eventually receive the verdict of not being guilty because of the insanity and are allowed in order to own a firearm and at the same time there is an entire list for the National Instant Criminal Background check system and in this, a person is usually not able to own one firearm that needs to be entered. But then there are many other different people who aren’t supposed to own one firearm and never usually add the list. There are also people who eventually believe that this list eventually goes on against federalism. In the year 1997, the Supreme Court eventually ruled that the congress can’t eventually force states to the report of a person who is further prohibited in order to own a firearm and also attempted in order to purchase the firearms to the US federal bureau of investigation. There is a lack of obligation that makes the list incomplete. While in some of the states it doesn’t report at all and others usually think it is not needed to be on the list such as someone who eventually are leaving the hospital and have been cured of the mental illness. There are some of the states who report too little and at the same time involve the government in order to know about the patients who were basically involuntarily committed to the hospital for the 90 days and those who weren’t admitted to the mental hospital then but a public hospital either. Approximately, 27 states in the year 2007 didn’t report any people out there who eventually suffered from the mental illness and sometimes people who are basically on the list can prevent the background checks and is basically prevalent at the dealers that are basically unlicensed in order to deal with the second-hand guns at the same time. In some of the states that usually sell Brady permits and also falls in the licensed seller to further waive the complete background check and this is basically offered in the 19 states. Out of different states, seven of the states usually don’t exclude people who usually have mental illness in order to buy a firearm. The major identification of the individuals is considered to be critical to further have firearms laws that are usually effective. Firearms need to be kept out their reach and by doing this it is considered to be a challenge. The blanket restrictions that are basically applied to each and everyone and it needs to consider the rights afforded to the people through the constitution and at the same time identifying those who are considered to be dangerous and it is also difficult and full of errors at the same time. Also, this might become equally dangerous and aren’t that much compulsory and shouldn’t be involved in the list. Someone with the substance abuse who already has been released from the mental institution couldn’t get the permission in order to buy a gun. Generally, prohibited people often find a firearms dealer who eventually sells them as a weapon and there are several states that have to acquire the laws to license them in order to purchase the firearm. At the same time, it was hence discovered that the person was basically restricted from owning a firearm and has one in possession as police often don’t have the authority in order to do anything about the possession. This is considered to be tough and approx 3 million American with the mental illness usually meet this criterion for the person should eventually not be allowed to own a firearm. One of the biggest challenges, in order to keep the people who eventually have the mental illness keeping away from the firearms and also protecting the patient dignity and privacy at the same time.  Therefore, loosening the doctor-patient confidentiality and opening up the laws, that basically requires the basic names of other mentally ill patients that need to be registered at the central desk that would further discourage the people from being honest with their doctors. There are some of the people who might not even seek treatment for their ailments if then there is some kind of change that they eventually won’t be able to own a firearm at the same time.

Hence, it is considered to be quite difficult in order to apply the gun control strategy that is basically targeted as in individuals. There are people who are finding ways in order to own guns from the dealers even if they have mental illness and a criminal record. Those dealers eventually are shut down and also the freedom that they are eventually enjoying now and should eventually be curbed by the federally enforceable law at the same time. so, instead of approaching the gun control from the perspective of the eliminating the certain groups from the gun ownership and there should eventually be a blanket regulation in effect that further limits the possession to all of the people. This would further require the amendment to the basic constitution but this is generally required in order to bring the document into the 21^st century and the gun ownership to the constitution right and at the same time it should eventually be noted that when all the legislation was eventually written and life is basically different and the guns were more compulsory for the protection and also hunting at the same time. Now, apart from the owning guns all the people can utilize home security systems in order to keep their families safe and guns are no longer a fundamental means in order to ensure the safety of the public and then they procure more harm than good.