Beam071 : Advanced Corporate Reporting Assessment Answer

Conceptual Framework is said to play a significant part in the process of accounting. This is mainly due to the fact that conceptual framework aids in better comprehension of information of accounting. Moreover, conceptual framework helps in promoting harmonization by delivering a basis for selection of most of appropriate treatment of accounting allowed by financial standard of accounting. In essence, this also aids in dealing with specific events, business dealings, specific conditions or else circumstances. As such, it can be hereby mentioned that this specific framework can aid users of financial assertions in comprehending information enclosed in financial assertions prepared in compliance with financial standards of accounting.

Ravitchand Riggan (2016) asserts that conceptual framework also lead towards development of financial accounting standardin the upcoming period as well as regulation of different subjective judgement by administration whilst preparation of financial assertion as well as another financial assertions. In addition to this, this assists in the process of establishing national standards that can help in establishing particular bodies in enhancing national standards of accounting. Furthermore, this delivers the ones interested in functions with information regarding the approach to designing financial standard of accounting. Therefore, according to the viewpoints of Ngai, Taoand Moon (2015), conceptual framework can absolutely be regarded as a significant document for the entire board along with the constituent. Therefore, it can be hereby mentioned that chief usage of the framework is to ensure that this framework delivers an essential conceptual underpinning that aids the entire board in addressing diverse issues.

As rightly indicated by Imenda (2014), conceptual framework can be considered to be imperative for financiers. It is mainly owing to the fact that this delivers the risk capital to all the financiers and consultants as well as advisors is considered withrisk inherent from investments. In essence, this information is required to assist in the process of ascertainment of whether it needs to be sold, bought or else hold shares. In itself, information can facilitate the capability of the business enterprises to disburse dividends interests by particularly shareholders. In essence, employees as well as their representative groups are also concerned about the stability as well as profitability of workforces (Arnold2014). The information can allow them to evaluate the capability of the corporation to provide retirement benefits, opportunities of employees as well as remuneration.

Furthermore, this helps lenders to ensure that their loans as well as interests will be disbursed when outstanding. Next, the information of the total amount of wealthborrowed by various suppliers as well as trade creditors is significant for them as it might ascertain whether the wealth will be disbursed when owed. As correctly mentioned by Green (2014), trade creditors essentially have an interest towards a business enterprise over short term than lenders unless they are needy on the continuance of the firm as a major purchaser. In addition to this, business concerns are also fascinatedin the information regardingcontinuance of the business concerns, particularly during development of the business concern during the long term. Ultimately, allocation of varied resources as well as actions of business concerns is crucial for government as well as their agencies. Fundamentally, this information helps in the process of ascertainment of policies of taxation, as the foundation for national earnings, ascertain taxation strategies as well as identical statistics.

An overview of the main theory or theories that are relevant to the selected topic and used in the selected journal papers 

The article “Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Constructions of the Accounting Profession” by Hines in 1989 essentially presents the fact that professional practitioners have the authority to illustrate individuals as well as circumstances, recommend as well as predicate outcomes for individual as well as for community founded on definitions, determine what is standard, stigmatise else wise normalise individual, scrutinize individuals and frame decisions. This article put forward the fact that CF projects is a strategic attempt to help in socially developing appearance of a differentiated base of knowledge for standards of accounting, thereby legitimising standards as well as power along with self-regulation of profession of accounting.  Thus, projects on CF are said to be carried out by professionals despite apparent failure of each and every project particularly from technical as well as functional viewpoint. The article examined the entire body of knowledge that is the base of financial accounting exercise. From analysis of body of financial accounting facts presented in the article it can be hereby comprehended that it stemmed that the knowledge core of particularly financial accounting is extremely problematic, that is not exclusive to accountants and is necessarily differentiated from other professional domains namely regulations. In essence, this raised the specific question regarding the way accountants have attained an important success level in particularly professionalism. A concise study of the nations as well as situations of conceptual framework projects recommended that the chief rationale carrying out CF was necessarily not functional else wise technical, but was a strategic scheme for delivering legitimacy for specific standard establishing boards as well as accounting profession during competition or else endangered government interference. As rightly indicated by Norrisand Bonventre 2015, projects on particularly conceptual framework as political resources in the procedures of professionalism.

The professional article published by Australian Accounting Standards Board on Importance of Conceptual Framework (CF) for Financial Reporting titled “Estimation uncertainty and the IASB proposed conceptual framework” by Craig, Smieliauskas and Amernic (2017) helps in understanding the usefulness of the same. This article mentions that CF for financial reporting elucidates overall objective as well as notions for particularly general purpose financial reporting. Essentially, this is illustrated as a practical tool that can help in helping International Accounting Standards Board to design standards that are founded on consistent notions (Yamauchi, Ponte, Ratliffe, and Traynor 2017). Also, this helps several preparers in developing consistent policies of accounting at the time when no standard is applicable to specific dealing else wise events else wise even when a specific standard permits a selection of diverse accounting strategy. In addition to this, this standard also helps in helping understanding as well as interpreting specific standards.  The professional article pronounced by AASB explains that the primary aim of the general purpose financial reporting is to deliver financial information regarding the reporting concern that is effective to different subsisting as well as potential financiers, varied lenders along with various other creditors in framing decisions concerning purchase, sell else wise holding equity as well as debt instruments. In essence, these decisions undertaken by financiers regarding purchasing, selling else wise holding both equity as well as dent instruments rely on the returns earned from specific investments in different instruments (Singer, O’Brien, and LeCloux, 2017). Also, this article elucidates in detail that there are several financiers along with lenders as well as creditors that call for direct information from the reporting entities and depend on general purpose financial reporting (GPFR). Nevertheless, GPFR cannot deliver all information that is required for the users. In essence, to a great extent, different financial assertions are mainly based on varied estimates, specific judgements along with models in place of appropriate depictions. Kimand Sheridan, (2015) suggests that the CF institutes varied notions that underlie these approximations, varied judgements as well as models. Basically, the notions can be considered as the objective towards which presenters of financial assertions strive. However, the overall vision of the CF is unlikely to be attained entirely, as this takes time to comprehend, assume as well as execute novel ways of evaluating business transactions as well as other events (Russell, Irwinand Williams2018). Nonetheless, instituting an objective towards which to struggle is necessary in case if financial reporting is to develop so as to enhance overall usefulness.

Article on Accounting theory and conceptual framework formulated by setters of accounting standard by Yong, Lim, and Tan 2016 titled “Theory and practice of the proposed conceptual framework: Evidence from the field” is necessarily founded on recognition of particularly “good practice” based on which specific principles are deduced inductively. In essence, the criteria for the purpose of recognizing specific good practice are associated to mainly the assumed objectives of financial assertions. Again, during the same time, specific attention is paid to especially conceptual coherence as well as development procedures typically involving tidying up of conceptual notions. Libby (2017) suggests that this conceptual framework might perhaps be written in a specific prescriptive way else wise descriptive manner, otherwise a combination of both. However, in any specific circumstance, they are necessarily normative as they have the requirement to deliver a cluster of principles as a lead to establishing as well as analysing standards of accounting. In essence, this kind of guidance does not stop a standard from being declared for compelling pragmatic causes, goes away from definite principle mentioned in the applicable conceptual framework. Essentially, this framework is applicable to a wide range of models of accounting and delivers guidance on preparation as well as presentation of financial assertion developed under the selected model. During the current period, it is necessarily not the intention of the board to recommend a specific model other than in extraordinary circumstances.

Another article on review of literature and conceptual framework by Zacca and Dayan (2017) titled “Entrepreneurship: an evolving conceptual framework” helps in understanding the coverage of the same suggests that this conceptual framework primarily covers the notions that form a chief basis for the research. In essence, the conceptual framework mainly comprises of a glance on particularly entrepreneurship as well as its evolution, discussion on particularly entrepreneur (that discusses whether entrepreneurs are essentially or are made). In addition to this, the conceptual framework also covers the notion of description of specifically move and this includes market orientation as well as value enhancement. The article mentions that development of specifically accounting theory need to be made possible. Nilsen (2015) argues that specific notion need to have three different components namely, encoding of particularly phenomenon to essentially symbolic reflection, manipulation else wise integration to regulations.  

The conceptual framework can be said to be is like a constitution as said in the article “Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework” by Cajaiba-Santana (2014). The US Standards Financial Accounting Board in the defined a conceptual framework can be said to be a coherent system of interrelated fundamentals and adjectives that can lead to consistent rules and that prescribes the function, nature, and financial accounting limits and  the financial statements. The conceptual framework is needed in the profession of accounting in order to relate and build on a body of concepts that is established along with the objectives. In addition to that the conceptual framework provide an outline to solve emerging and new practical issues. It also enhances the users ‘of the financial statement for the understanding and providing confidence in the financial reporting (Zullig 2016). The conceptual framework increased the comparability among the various financial statements. The International Accounting Standard Board therefore is known as the IASB, establishes the standards that can be outlined in the Framework for the preparing and presenting the Financial Statements. The IASB that was framed in the year in 2001 and is referred to as the body of standard-setting for the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) Foundation, which is a private sector that is independent as is a body that not-for-profit and the external IFRS Advisory Council supports them and an IFRS Interpretations Committee offers guidance to them. The IASB is committed to develop for the interest of the public along with a single set ofquality that is high and global standard of accounting that gives transparent high quality and information that is comparable in general financial statements purpose. In order to fulfil the duties of standard-setting the IASB follows a thorough, open, and transparent due process of which the publication of consultative documents, such as discussion papers and exposure drafts, for public comment is an important component. The IASB closely engages with the stakeholders all around the globe that includes the analysts, investors, business leaders, regulators and accounting standard-setters the profession of accounting. In order to peruse this purpose of the IASB conducts extensive public consultation and seeks the co-operation of national and international bodies globally.

The study by  Zhang and Andrew (2014) titled “Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework” helps in understanding overall framework document to establish the notions that underlie overall preparation as well as presentation of financial assertions for external users as established in particularly conceptual framework for chiefly financial reporting. The articles analysed herein helps in understanding coverage of the framework that includes objectives, underlying suppositions, qualitative features, components of financial assertions, overall recognition along with measurement of different components of financial statements together with notions of capital as well as capital maintenance. Objectives are to deliver financial information regarding financial position, financial performance as well as alterations in pecuniary position. Essentially, financial position gets affected by various economic resources, way the same is financially structured, liquidity as well as solvency of the entity and capacity of the entity to adapt to alterations. Also, as per conceptual framework, financial performance can be evaluated to forest overall opportunity to create flows of cash from resources that the entity controls and to design judgements regarding the way resource different resources are made effective. Again, the conceptual framework mentions alterations in particularly financial position. In essence, overview of conceptual framework also presents the way of analysing different actions such as investing, financing as well as operating activities. This can analyse capability of the entity to generate overall cash as well as cash equivalents. Furthermore, this includes evaluation of capability of the entity to create cash well as cash equivalents, alterations in financial position can also be evaluated to observe the way entity utilizes the flows of cash. Zhangand Andrew (2014) suggests that underlying assumptions is an important segment of the conceptual framework and mentions about two different fundamental terms that are considered within the structure. Fundamentally, these include accrual basis of accounting as well as going concern basis. In essence, accrual basis of accounting primarily specifies that a particular entity need to recognize overall impacts of transactions as well as other events at the time when they happen and not when they are disbursed or at the time when the cash is accepted in settlement. Furthermore, a business concern needs to identify all the business transactions along with events in especially the financial assertions during the period to which they associate. Again, the going concern basis refers to the fact that in case if financial assertions are necessarily prepared on essentially the going concern basis, then this supposes that the business entity shall continue to function for foreseeable period. In essence, this informs diverse users regarding the fact that the business entity has the intention to liquidate else wise materially curtail overall operations. Frynasand Yamahaki (2016) suggests that this article on conceptual framework talks about qualitative characteristics that takes in comparability, verifiability, and timeliness as well as understanding ability. The CF calls for enhancing qualitative features that need to be optimised to great extent. On the other hand, this also identifies that the enhancing featured cannot present information if same information is irrelevant or else faithfully reflected. The implementation of enhancing features is necessarily an iterative procedure and CF identifies that it does not follow a prescribed order. Further, this article mentions about specific feature of the conceptual framework that includes particular components of the financial assertions.  The specific elements are said to include assets, liabilities, earnings, expenditures as well as equity (Cohenand Shang2015). Moreover, the CF also includes details about recognition along with measurement of different components of financial assertions and notions of capital along with maintenance of capital.

Findings of the review 

The article titled  the Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Constructions of the Accounting Profession highlights the fact that CF projects is a strategic attempt to help in socially developing appearance of a differentiated base of knowledge for accounting standard, thereby legitimising standards as well as power along with self-regulation of profession of accounting the second article The professional article published by Australian Accounting Standards Board on  the importance of Conceptual Framework (CF) for Financial Reporting the overall vision of the CF is unlikely to be attained entirely, as this takes time to comprehend, assume as well as execute novel ways of evaluating business transactions as well as other events. Nonetheless, instituting an objective towards which to struggle is necessary in case if financial reporting is to develop so as to enhance overall usefulness.  The third article on Accounting theory and conceptual framework formulated by setters of accounting standard are necessarily founded on recognition of particularly “good practice” based on which specific principles are deduced inductively conceptual framework might perhaps be written in a specific prescriptive way else wise descriptive manner, otherwise a combination of both. Lastly the article on review of literature and conceptual framework helps in understanding the coverage of the same suggests that this conceptual framework primarily covers the notions that form a chief basis for the research. The conceptual framework increased the comparability among the various financial statements. Based on analysis of the current article it can be hereby said that it is imperative at the beginning to comprehend that the framework document is in itself is not necessarily a standard. The primary function is to mainly help IASB in designing novel or else amended standards of accounting and to help different preparers of financial assertions implementing regulations and dealing with specific issues that are not covered by standards of accounting.

Conclusion:

It can be concluded from the review of the above articles that the conceptual framework aids in dealing with specific events, business dealings, specific conditions or else circumstances. As such, it can be hereby mentioned that this specific framework can aid users of financial assertions in comprehending information enclosed in financial assertions prepared in compliance with financial standards of accounting.The study therefore helps in understanding conceptual framework document to establish the notions that underlie overall preparation as well as presentation of financial assertions for external users as established in particularly conceptual framework for chiefly financial reporting.

Introduction:

The current study indicates towards an accounting framework that is necessarily a coherent system of different inter-associated objectives as well as fundamentals that have the need to direct towards consistent standards that prescribe overall nature, operations as well as limitations of financial accounting as well as financial assertions. The primary cause behind developing a conceptual framework is that it provides a framework for establishing standards of accounting, groundwork for resolving different accounting disputes as well as fundamental principles which then need not be repetitive in standards of accounting (Lattucaand Litzinger2015). Moreover, conceptual framework can necessarily be classified in respect of distinctive function of particularly firm’s management accounting. Furthermore, the way in which overall utility of results of management accounting procedures can be examined. Basically, conceptual framework can be considered to be criteria that can be utilized to evaluate overall value of the procedures along with work technologies utilized in management accounting as well as capabilities essentially related to efficacies of management accounting function on the whole.

Reference:

Arnold, Arthur P. "Conceptual frameworks and mouse models for studying sex differences in physiology and disease: why compensation changes the game." Experimental neurology259 (2014): 2-9.

Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany. "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82 (2014): 42-51.

Cohen, Catherine Crawford, and Jingjing Shang. "Evaluation of conceptual frameworks applicable to the study of isolation precautions effectiveness." Journal of advanced nursing 71, no. 10 (2015): 2279-2292.

Craig, Smieliauskas, and Amernic. Estimation Uncertainty and the IASB's Proposed Conceptual Framework. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1)(2017): 112-114.

Frynas, J?drzej George, and Camila Yamahaki. "Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives." Business Ethics: A European Review 25, no. 3 (2016): 258-285.

Green, Helen Elise. "Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research." Nurse Researcher (2014+) 21, no. 6 (2014): 34.

Hines, Ruth D. "Financial accounting knowledge, conceptual framework projects and the social construction of the accounting profession." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2, no. 2 (1989).

Imenda, Sitwala. "Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks?." Journal of Social Sciences 38, no. 2 (2014): 185-195.

Kim, Elizabeth Moorman, and Susan M. Sheridan. "Foundational aspects of family–school connections: Definitions, Conceptual frameworks, and research needs." In Foundational aspects of family-school partnership research, pp. 1-14. Springer, Cham, 2015.

Lattuca, Lisa R., and Thomas A. Litzinger. "Studying teaching and learning in undergraduate engineering programs: Conceptual frameworks to guide research on practice." In Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Libby, Robert. "Accounting and human information processing." In The Routledge Companion to Behavioural Accounting Research, pp. 42-54. Routledge, 2017.

Ngai, Eric WT, Spencer SC Tao, and Karen KL Moon. "Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks." International Journal of Information Management35, no. 1 (2015): 33-44.

Nilsen, Per. "Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks." Implementation Science 10, no. 1 (2015): 53.

Norris, Robert J., and Catherine L. Bonventre. "Advancing wrongful conviction scholarship: Toward new conceptual frameworks." Justice Quarterly 32, no. 6 (2015): 929-949.

Ravitch, Sharon M., and Matthew Riggan. Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research. Sage Publications, 2016.

Russell, Noah, Derek Irwin, and Jamie Williams. "Pushing the Boundaries of Appliability: Conceptual Frameworks in Cognitive Science and Functional Linguistics." In Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics, pp. 47-67. Routledge, 2018.

Singer, Jonathan B., Kimberly H. McManama O’Brien, and Mary LeCloux. "Three psychotherapies for suicidal adolescents: overview of conceptual frameworks and intervention techniques." Child and adolescent social work journal 34, no. 2 (2017): 95-106.

Yamauchi, Lois A., Eva Ponte, Katherine T. Ratliffe, and Kevin Traynor. "Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks Used in Research on Family–School Partnerships." SCHOOL COMMUNITY 27, no. 2 (2017): 9.

Yong, Kevin Ow, Chu Yeong Lim, and Pearl Tan. "Theory and practice of the proposed conceptual framework: Evidence from the field." Advances in Accounting 35 (2016): 62-74.

Zacca, Robert, and Mumin Dayan. "Entrepreneurship: an evolving conceptual framework." International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 21, no. 1-2 (2017): 8-26.

Zhang, Ying, and Jane Andrew. "Financialisation and the conceptual framework." Critical perspectives on accounting25, no. 1 (2014): 17-26.

Zhang, Ying, and Jane Andrew. "Financialisation and the conceptual framework." Critical perspectives on accounting25, no. 1 (2014): 17-26. Zhang, Y. and Andrew, J., 2014

Zullig, Leah L., Heather E. Whitson, Susan N. Hastings, Chris Beadles, Julia Kravchenko, Igor Akushevich, and Matthew L. Maciejewski. "A systematic review of conceptual frameworks of medical complexity and new model development." Journal of general internal medicine 31, no. 3 (2016): 329-337.